words by kurt
  • Home
  • Core Clients
    • Engineers & Scientists
    • Nonfiction Authors
    • Family Historians
    • Consulting
  • Quotes & Pricing
  • Resources
  • Writing Tips
  • Contact
Improving writing one writer at a time

Tip #172: Remember that strata are as stratum is

9/19/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Precision of language produces more effective technical writing simply because it speaks to an attention to detail that most if not all in your audience will associate with professionalism.  Less effective writers often produce less effective writing because they miss those details.

Here’s a common example: Nouns coming to the English language from Greek often have both a singular and plural form, but often one of these words is mistakenly used in place of both.  Case in point: the plural strata is often used in place of the singular stratum.  Strata is familiar to many, whereas stratum is not so familiar, so it’s easy to understand the common mistaken usage.

However, strata is a plural noun and should be used only with a plural verb.  Thus, strata are whereas stratum is.  Remember that strata are as stratum is, and you will be one step closer to producing the more effective technical writing that will communicate true professionalism to your audience, who will then associate you and your brands with that professionalism.  And in the end, that impression is the one you want to make.

0 Comments

Tip #165: Remember the main tenet about using tenant

3/21/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Recently we’ve been aboard the precision-of-language train because it takes us to more effective technical writing.  Three posts ago we considered precision of language as exemplified in the correct use of the word affinity.  Two posts ago we distinguished the words defective and deficient.  Last week we discussed attribute and contribute.  In this post we consider two words with the same pronunciation but different spellings and even more different meanings — tenant and tenet.

In addition to sharing the same pronunciation, tenant and tenet are both nouns.  However, their meanings differ greatly.  A tenant is someone who occupies a property which belongs to someone else.  However, a tenet is a central principle or belief.

Consider the example sentence in the cropped sentence above.  Clearly the writer intended to use a different word.  But not knowing (or not remembering) the difference between spoken English and written English, the writer selected the wrong spelling.  It’s an easy enough mistake; both words sound the same.  But they don’t mean the same, so let’s make a revision:


The concept of equilibrium exemplifies a tenet in the study of mechanics as well as the natural universe.

Remember the main tenet about using tenant — don’t write like you speak when writing for technical audiences!  Spoken English and written English have important differences.  Respecting those differences in your technical writing by employing precision of language will provide greater clarity to your audiences.  Greater clarity better communicates your message.  And that more effective presentation will in turn more effectively promote you and your brands in the minds of your audience.
0 Comments

Tip #164: Make sure you contribute the right attribute

2/7/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Lately we’ve been discussing precision of language.  That’s because the right word can make all the difference between producing a more effective presentation and a less effective one.  Two posts ago we examined precision of language as exemplified in the correct use of the word affinity.  In the last post we considered the words defective and deficient.  In this post we discuss attribute and contribute.

Attribute can be either a verb or a noun.  To help distinguish between the two usages, the pronunciation places the accent on a different syllable.  When the accent is placed on the first syllable, attribute is a noun which means a quality or characteristic.  When the accent is placed on the second syllable, attribute is a verb which means to indicate a cause or source.  Conversely, contribute is a verb which means to give or offer.

It may seem silly to make these distinctions.  Using contribute where you should use attribute just seems wrong, especially when you read the sentence out loud.  Yet some writers have mistaken these two words, using one when the other was intended.  Even more writers have confused the two forms of attribute.  They used the noun when the verb should have been used, and vice versa.  

So make sure you contribute the right attribute to your technical writing.  Precision of language will help you craft a more effective message to your audience.  And that leaves them with a more effective representation of both you and your brands.

0 Comments

Tip #163: Don’t be defective in using deficient

1/10/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
More effective writing employs precision of language.  That’s because using the right word can make all the difference in conveying the right meaning and producing a more effective presentation.  In the last post we discussed precision of language as exemplified in the correct use of the word affinity.  In this post we employ a different example: the words defective and deficient.

The words defective and deficient both share the same grammatical function; they’re both adjectives.  However, these words have related but different meanings.  Defective means faulty, but deficient means lacking something necessary.

Consider the example sentence in the cropped graphic above.  Here the writer intends to communicate that the alloy has less of a constituent than expected.  The alloy is therefore deficient (missing some ingredient) and not defective (faulty).


The alloy was deficient in vanadium; spectrographic analysis showed a vanadium content of 0.5%.

One could argue that because the alloy is deficient in an important element (vanadium is often added for desirable strength and corrosion-resistant properties), the alloy is defective.  But that is not the intention of the writer here.  If it were, we would see mention of some performance standard which the alloy failed to meet.  Since the alloy has a lower-than-anticipated vanadium content, it very well may fail to meet some performance standard.  But the example sentence contains a content standard, not a performance one.

Don’t be defective in using deficient.  Use the right word to employ precision of language in your writing.  You’ll produce more effective presentations of your message.  And that in turn will better represent both you and your brands in the minds of your audience.
0 Comments

Tip #162: Develop the ability to use affinity effectively

12/20/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Precision of language has returned again and again as a persistent theme in this blog because it comprises an important aspect of more effective writing.  Every more effective writer knows using the right word can make all the difference in conveying the right meaning.  And that can produce a more effective presentation.

The word affinity provides a good example.  Affinity means a close relationship based on a common origin or structure as well as the tendency of a substance to combine with another.  Note that the common idea here is one of relation.  That’s because affinity comes from the Latin word afinis, which means related.

Some more informal fields of writing may accept using affinity to mean ability or aptitude.  However, more effective technical writing will employ precision of language and simply use these words when those meanings are intended.

Consider the example sentence in the cropped graphic above.  Clearly the writer did not intend to suggest that the design shares a common origin or structure with its environment or that the design is attracted to its environment and somehow motivated to combine with it.  The writer uses affinity to mean ability, which use is less effective for technical writing.  Revising that sentence into something more effective is easy.  Just use the word with the intended meaning.


The success of the latest design in this environment rests with the ability of our new proprietary alloy to withstand stress corrosion cracking.

Don’t follow the less effective example.  Develop the ability to use affinity effectively and employ precision of language in your writing.  You’ll produce more effective presentations of your message to your audience.  And that in turn will better represent both you and your brands to that audience.
0 Comments

Tip #156: Don’t be an average writer

6/14/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Precision of language comprises a key difference between more effective writers and average ones.  That’s why we’ve repeatedly addressed different specific instances of precision of language in this forum.  Today we’re going to examine another such instance involving the word average.

An average is a quantity derived by dividing the sum of two or more individual quantities by the number of quantities.  The word appears as a noun, a verb, and an adjective.  Most of the confusion less effective writers have involves its use as a verb.

Consider the example sentence in the cropped graphic above.  A more effective writer understands that an average by definition requires more than one unit or element.  Furthermore, each individual steel bar has its own length, which may or may not be the average length.  Thus, a more effective writer would employ precision of language to revise the example sentence.


The fifty steel bars in the lot average 205 cm in length.

Technically, the concept of average does not recommend using the word as a verb.  Its now common use in spoken English has proliferated that application widely.  However, as we’ve often seen in this forum, spoken English and written English are not the same animal.

Precision of language separates the more effective writers from the less effective average ones.  So don’t be an average writer!  Understand the proper use of average, and you can present your messages in writing more effectively.  That in turn will improve the estimation your audience gives to both you and your brands.
0 Comments

Tip #155: You’ll likely write better when you understand libel and liable

5/17/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Recently we’ve been riding the precision of language train.  Three posts ago we examined the correct use of the construction both . . . and.  Two posts ago we reviewed the difference between figuratively and literally, two words that many writers confuse.  In the last post we resolved the confusion many writers have between insoluble and unsolvable.  In this post, we’ll look at three additional words that many writers confuse — libel, liable, and likely.

The word among these three that connects with the other two is liable, which means responsible by law, legally answerable, and subject by law to.  The word has a clear connotation of the law and legal matters.  Yet when expressing in speech the idea of probability of occurrence, many use the word as a substitute for likely, even if no connotation of the law is intended.

Precise writers will use likely to express conditions of probability and liable to express subjugation to the law.  Thus, these writers would revise the sentence in the cropped graphic above to read as follows:


Such service conditions make the casing likely to corrode.

Many writers confuse not only liable and likely but also liable and libel.  Thus they use libel, which is anything distributed visually (writing or pictures) that damages someone’s reputation, when they really intend to convey the meaning of likely.

You’ll likely write better when you understand libel and liable.  Using that precision of language promotes your own reputation as a more effective writer who can present desired messages to your audience more effectively.  And that more effectively represents both you and your brands to that same audience.
0 Comments

Tip #154: Knowing when to use insoluble is not unsolvable

4/19/2018

2 Comments

 
Picture
Precision of language produces more effective technical writing.  Recently we’ve been examining some specific instances of this concept.  Three posts ago we considered the difference between datum and data.  Two posts ago we learned the proper use of the construction both . . . and.  In the last post we examined the difference between figuratively and literally, two words that many writers confuse.  In this post we’ll consider two other words that many writers confuse — insoluble and unsolvable.

Insoluble means incapable of being dissolved.  Unsolvable means impossible to solve.  Less careful writers use these words interchangeably.  However, the definitions of these two words make very clear that insoluble and unsolvable are not interchangeable.

Consider the example sentence in the cropped graphic above.  By using insoluble, the writer communicates that the production problem is unable to dissolve in something.  But problems don’t dissolve into anything; they don’t dissolve at all.  Unsolvable is the better word choice.


The production problem remained unsolvable until yesterday when a line worker recognized a solution.

By using more precise language, writers can avoid possible confusion and communicate their messages more clearly.

Knowing when to use insoluble is not unsolvable.  Understand the difference in definition, and you will know which word will more clearly communicate your meaning.  That greater precision in language will increase the effectiveness of your writing.  And that will in turn make a better presentation of both you and your brands to your audience.
2 Comments

Tip #153: Literally understand what figuratively means

3/22/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Lately we’ve been discussing the importance of precision in language within technical writing.  Two posts ago we learned the difference between datum and data.  In the last post we examined the construction both . . . and.  In this week we’ll continue our trek into precision of language by reviewing the difference between figuratively and literally.  (And yes, we will do this literally, not figuratively!)

Figuratively means metaphorically or allegorically.  Literally means really, actually, or in a literal manner or sense.  Some writers confuse these two words, using them interchangeably.  However, the definitions of these two words make very clear that figuratively and literally represent mutually exclusive concepts.  They are not interchangeable.

Consider the example sentence in the cropped graphic above.  Adding the word figuratively would clarify the true meaning of this sentence.


The factory workers were figuratively on fire.

One would not use the word literally instead of figuratively in this instance, because that would confirm that the factory workers were aflame and burning.  In addition, more effective technical writers would not use the idiom on fire, which is informal language and as such has no place in more effective technical writing.  Here’s one possible replacement:

The factory workers set a new production record.

By using more formal and precise language, writers can avoid the use of figuratively altogether.

Literally understand what figuratively means, and you can produce more effective technical writing through greater precision in language.  More effective writing means a better presentation, and that will create a better impression of you and your brands in the minds of your audience.
0 Comments

Tip #152: Parallel structures balance both grammar and logic

2/15/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
In the last post we discussed precision of language in using the words datum and data.  In this post we’ll stay on that precision of language train by examining the construction both . . . and.

Using both . . . and introduces a parallel structure into a sentence.  That means that this construction is most effective when whatever follows both matches whatever follows and in both grammar and logic.  (See how I worked that in there?)

To illustrate, let’s examine the example sentence in the cropped graphic above.  At first glance, one might not detect any error with the sentence.  But the construction is not parallel.  Look at the elements that follow each of the key words in the construction.  Both is followed by ensuring clarity.  And is followed by conciseness.  Both of these elements are noun phrases; however, the first contains a gerund (which is a verb form being used as a noun) and the second does not (it is simply a noun).

Technical writers can make this example sentence more effective by matching the elements after each key word in the both . . . and construction.  They can either change the first element to match the second or change the second element to match the first.


Mastering technical writing requires both clarity and conciseness.

Mastering technical writing requires both ensuring clarity and maximizing conciseness.

Notice how in each instance the elements after the key words match one another in both grammar and logic.  This congruence makes the use of a parallel structure more effective.  Greater precision of language makes for more effective technical writing.  And that can make more effective presentations that more effectively represent both you and your brands to your audience.
0 Comments
<<Previous
    Picture

    Author

    Howdy!  I'm Lance, Managing Editor of words by kurt.  I'm also an engineer and an educator.  With degrees in both engineering and English, I've been providing writing-related services since 1997, and I want to help my fellow engineers become better writers.  That's why in 2014 I started providing free writing tips via this blog.  Enjoy!

    Archives

    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    Abbreviations
    Accumulative Vs Cumulative
    Acronyms
    Activate Vs Actuate
    Active Voice
    Active Voice Vs. Passive Voice
    Adapt Vs Adept Vs Adopt
    Ad Hoc
    Adjectives
    Adverbs
    Affect
    Affect Vs Effect
    Affinity
    Aforesaid
    Agree In Number
    All Around / All-around / All-round
    All Ready Vs Already
    All Together Vs Altogether
    Allude Vs Elude Vs Refer
    Allusion Vs Illusion
    Almost Vs Most
    A Lot
    Also
    Apostrophe
    As Per
    As Such
    Assure Vs Ensure Vs Insure
    As To
    As To Whether
    As Well As Vs Both
    Attribute
    Audience
    Average
    A While Vs Awhile
    Bad /badly
    Balance Vs Remainder
    Because
    Because Of
    Between You And Me
    Bi-/semi-
    Both ... And
    Both Vs As Well As
    Brevity
    Bunch
    Cannot Help But
    Can Vs May
    Capitalization
    Capital Vs Capitol
    Clarity And Conciseness
    Colon
    Commas
    Committee
    Compare To/with
    Compose Vs Comprise
    Conjunctions
    Connotation
    Consensus
    Context
    Continual Vs Continuous
    Contribute
    Credible Vs Creditable
    Credit As/with
    Criterion / Criteria / Criterions
    Cumulative Vs Accumulative
    Dash
    Dates
    Datum Vs Data
    Decided Vs Decisive
    Defective Vs Deficient
    Definite Vs Definitive
    Denotation
    Despite
    Despite / Despite Of
    Distinguish From
    Do It/so
    Due To
    Each Other
    Each Other Vs One Another
    Economic Vs Economical
    Effect
    Either/or
    Elude Vs Allude Vs Refer
    Ensure Vs Insure
    Euphemisms
    Everybody Vs Everyone
    Farther Vs Further
    Few
    Figuratively Vs Literally
    Fine
    Flammable
    Foreign Words
    Good Vs Well
    Half
    Hyphens
    If And When
    If Vs. Whether
    Illegal Vs Illicit
    Illusion Vs Allusion
    Inasmuch-as
    In Comparison To/with
    In-contrast-towith
    Incredible Vs Incredulous
    Infinitive Verbs
    Inflammable
    Initialisms
    In Order To
    Inside (of)
    Insofar As
    Insoluble Vs Unsolvable
    In Spite Of
    Intensifiers
    In-terms-of
    Its Vs. It's
    Lay Vs. Lie
    Lend/loan
    Liable
    Libel
    -like
    Likely
    Lists
    Literally Vs Figuratively
    Long Variants
    Loose Vs Lose
    May Be Vs Maybe
    May Vs Can
    More/less Than
    Most Vs Almost
    Mr. Morton
    MS (MSS)
    Neither/nor
    Neo-
    Nice
    Nominalization
    Nonflammable
    Notable Vs Noticeable
    Not And
    Nouns
    Number Vs.amount
    Observance Vs Observation
    Of Which Vs Whose
    Okay / OK / O.K.
    On Account Of
    One Another
    Only
    On The Grounds Of/that
    Oral
    Outside (of)
    Parallel Structure
    Party
    Passed Vs Past
    Passive Voice
    People Vs Persons
    Per
    Plural Possessive Nouns
    Possessive Nouns
    Precision In Writing
    Predicate
    Pronoun Antecedent Agreement
    Pronouns
    Proved Vs Proven
    Quid Pro Quo
    Quite
    Rather
    Redundant Words
    Refer Vs Allude Vs Elude
    Remainder
    Respective/respectively
    Schoolhouse Rock
    Semi-/bi-
    Semicolon
    Shall Vs Will
    Singular Possessive Nouns
    -size / -sized
    So
    Some
    Some Vs Somewhat
    So That Vs Such That
    Split Infinitives
    Spoken English Vs Written English
    Strata Vs Stratum
    Subject
    Subject Verb Agreement
    Subject-verb Agreement
    Such
    Such That Vs So That
    Tenant Vs Tenet
    Tenet Vs Tenant
    Than Vs. Then
    That Vs Where
    The Fact Is
    Too
    To Vs Too Vs Two
    Try And/to
    Unsolvable Ve Insoluble
    Verbal
    Verbs
    Very
    Waiting For/on
    Well Vs Good
    When And If
    Where . . . At
    Where Vs That
    Whether Or Not
    While
    Whose Vs Of Which
    Who's Vs Whose
    Who Vs. Whom
    Will Vs Shall
    -wise
    Wordiness
    Words Used As Words

    RSS Feed

    Copyright © 2014-2015
    words by kurt
    LLC

We Would Love to Help You Become a Better Writer!


Tech Writing

Accepting new jobs now!

Nonfiction

Accepting new jobs now!

Family History

Accepting new jobs now!

Consulting

Accepting new jobs now!