words by kurt
  • Home
  • Core Clients
    • Engineers & Scientists
    • Nonfiction Authors
    • Family Historians
    • Consulting
  • Quotes & Pricing
  • Resources
  • Writing Tips
  • Contact
Improving writing one writer at a time

Tip #50: Always recover from, never out of

12/23/2014

0 Comments

 

Picture
Along the same lines of the to tie idiom, the to recover idiom has a similar usage.  Note the example sentence in the graphic at left.

The verb to recover already denotes the sense of taking something out of something else, so to construct an idiom using to recover and out of is at least somewhat redundant.  And while redundancies in selected engineering systems may be desirable, very often in the best writing they are not.

From makes a better choice when constructing an idiom using to recover.  From complements the denotation of to recover rather than repeats it.  Thus, the writer should rewrite the example sentence as follows:


Although we were allowed to recover additional materials from the incident site, these materials did not provide any additional information regarding the incident.

Always recover from, never out of.

2014 has been a great year for words by kurt.  More tips will appear in 2015.  Until then, words by kurt is on vacation, celebrating the achievements of this year and preparing for even more achievements in the next.  Happy holidays to all, and see you in 2015!
0 Comments

Tip #49: Always tie to, never with

12/18/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Often in professional reports a writer will want to forge connections between two items or ideas. In so doing, the smart writer will avoid simply transcribing speech and understand the distinction between spoken English and written English.

Observe the example shown in the graphic at left.  Here the writer connects two ideas (the failure and poor operator training) by using an idiom containing the verb to tie and a preposition; the two elements acting in concert communicate connection between the two ideas.  But for the meaning intended to be conveyed, with is not the appropriate preposition.  To is.

Why is with not the appropriate preposition but to is?  Think about the idiom construction in terms of using rope to create a connection between two nearby trees.  The rope is the item you use to make the actual connection, not the tree.  You would never say “Connect the rope with the tree” because the tree is not making the connection; the rope is.  Rather you would say “Connect the rope to the tree” or “Connect the trees with the rope.”

In like manner, the to tie idiom is the rope you as a writer use to connect two items or ideas.  That’s why to tie to is appropriate and to tie with is not.  Thus, the writer should revise the example sentence as follows:


Although the committee tied the failure to poor operator training, our own investigation has lead us to different conclusions.

Always tie to, never with.  Better writing conveys better contexts while also conveying effectively the essential intended message.
0 Comments

Tip #48: You should have avoided using of

12/11/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
I seem to be on a roll harping on the distinction between spoken English and written English.  It’s a good roll since it gets at the heart of many of the difficulties that writers, and especially technical writers, have with producing good copy.

While we are on that roll, let’s look at another example highlighted in the graphic at left.  Often writers, and especially inexperienced writers, will simply transcribe speech when writing.  Such practices lead to ineffective structures such as the one in the example graphic.

Why is this structure ineffective?  The writer has produced as sentence with an incomplete verb.

The complete verb in question here is might have been avoided, which is actually a combination of three verbs: the simple past tense of might (which has an infinitive form without a preceding to), the present perfect tense of to be, and the simple past tense of to avoid.  Replacing have with of creates obvious structural problems, as the verb phrase requires all three parts to communicate the intended meaning.

Thus, a more properly written sentence would look like this:


Complete system failure might have been avoided had a redundant hydraulic subsystem been installed.

Picture
Could, should, and would function similarly to might.  Thus, the same guidelines apply when using verb phrases with these words as well.

The error is understandable.  Have and of sound very similar when spoken quickly enough — hence the problem in simply transcribing speech when writing.

However, I recommend that in your writing you rise above that common misconception and understand the distinctions between spoken English and written English.  Your readers will view your writing as well as you and the brands connected with your writing in a much better light.

0 Comments

Tip #47: Go between two items but among three or more items

12/9/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Idioms can present special challenges to the uninitiated.  Even seasoned writers who are worth their seasoning commit mistakes.  The difference between them and the uninitiated is that they make those mistakes much less often.

Take, for example, the idiom construction in the example sentence shown in the graphic.

The use of between here is inappropriate because by definition between links two separate items.  A more appropriate word is among, as its definition includes connections between more than two items.  The writer should rewrite the example sentence to appear thus:


Among corrosion, fretting, and fatigue as possible root cause failure mechanisms, corrosion appears to match best the evidence and circumstances surrounding the failure event.

Note the addition of the words root cause since these three failure modes typically work in tandem and this sentence likely appears in a report written to communicate the root cause of a failure event.

The big writing mistake here is likely the one I have discussed the most — a failure to distinguish between spoken English and written English.  When writing, go between two items but among three or more items.  Your writing will improve along with the professional image you project through your writing.
0 Comments

Tip #46: Bite the bullet in essays and the main body of reports

12/6/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Technical fields often require professionals to communicate complex information quickly.  Readability tools such as bullets are great devices for this type of job.  They summarize information into packets which readers can quickly process.

However, like all writing devices, bullets have their place.  Appropriate places to use bullets include presentation slides, resumes, flyers, and executive summaries in reports.  They do not belong in essays or the main body of reports.

It doesn’t take a lot of thought to understand why this is so.  Bullets are a readability device intended to communicate complex information quickly by dividing it into smaller packets and then organizing them in a list.  That works great for, say, an executive summary because the intention of the executive summary is to provide the essential crux of the information contained in the report.

But the main body of the report is intended to communicate detailed information in a space where time is not as much of a factor.  Using a time saving device in this environment is therefore inconsistent and not appropriate.
The graphic above summarizes the main points of this post and demonstrates an effective use of using bullets.  Note that only the essential conclusions are bulleted items.  The actual reasons for those conclusions, which is more detailed information, appears in the post itself.

Bite the bullet in essays and the main body of reports.  More consistent writing is more professional writing, and the attendant image will improve the estimation of the writer and the brands associated with that writing.

0 Comments

Tip #45: Just go from one to another

12/4/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
I’ve harped on the difference between written English and spoken English so often for good reason.  A failure to understand the difference or even to make the distinction keeps many professionals from become great writers.

The example sentence in the graphic above contains a good example.  Including the preposition up may be common and accepted in spoken English, but that usage labels the writer as an amateur in written English.

Adding up makes the sentence structurally inconsistent.  The idiom in question is from-to, a pairing of two prepositions, each with each own object.  Interjecting to provides one prepositional phrase with one preposition and one object (from) and a second prepositional phrase with two prepositions sharing the same object (up to).

The best structure when using idioms is a parallel one.  That’s why in this instance using up in written English is not appropriate.  Thus, the example sentence should be rewritten.


Since installing the new equipment, nonconformances have increased from an average of 2% per run to an average of 23% per run.

Note that in less than a month was removed, as the audience for this sentence very likely knows that the new  equipment was installed less than a month ago.

Never go from one up to another.  Just go from one to another.  Your writing will be that much more consistent with proper usage, and that will bolster the professional image you want your professional writing to convey.
0 Comments

Tip #44: They're using their words correctly there

12/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
I’ve harped before about the common failure among many writers to distinguish between written English and spoken English.  When completely different words sound the same, simply writing the words you speak may not always present you and the subject of your writing in the best light.

That’s why it’s important to understand that written English and spoken English are really two different animals.

One of the most common errors in this vein involves the words there, their, and they’re.  Take the example in the graphic above.


They’re placing their defective units in the bin over there.

This sentence uses the words in question correctly.
  • There is an adverb indicating relative location or position.  Here the writer uses there to describe the location of the bin where defective units are collected.  On a related note, there is is a phrase often used in informal communication to convey that something is or exists.
  • Their is an adjective used to convey possession of an object or objects to multiple third parties.  In this case, those multiple third parties are the workers placing defective units into the bin.  Their conveys the relationship between the workers and the defective units.
  • They’re is a contraction for the words they are.  You can always tell when a contraction is appropriate by replacing the contraction with the extended word form.  For this example,

They are placing their defective units in the bin over there.

That change makes sense, and so the contraction is grammatically correct.  However, contractions also convey an informal tone, and as such writers should avoid using them when their writing calls for a more formal tone.

The easy way to remember the difference between these three words which sound alike but function very differently is with a mnemonic device based on the example sentence in the graphic.  Just remember that they’re using their words correctly there, and you should be okay.
0 Comments
    Picture

    Author

    Howdy!  I'm Lance, Managing Editor of words by kurt.  I'm also an engineer and an educator.  With degrees in both engineering and English, I've been providing writing-related services since 1997, and I want to help my fellow engineers become better writers.  That's why in 2014 I started providing free writing tips via this blog.  Enjoy!

    Archives

    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    Abbreviations
    Accumulative Vs Cumulative
    Acronyms
    Activate Vs Actuate
    Active Voice
    Active Voice Vs. Passive Voice
    Adapt Vs Adept Vs Adopt
    Ad Hoc
    Adjectives
    Adverbs
    Affect
    Affect Vs Effect
    Affinity
    Aforesaid
    Agree In Number
    All Around / All-around / All-round
    All Ready Vs Already
    All Together Vs Altogether
    Allude Vs Elude Vs Refer
    Allusion Vs Illusion
    Almost Vs Most
    A Lot
    Also
    Apostrophe
    As Per
    As Such
    Assure Vs Ensure Vs Insure
    As To
    As To Whether
    As Well As Vs Both
    Attribute
    Audience
    Average
    A While Vs Awhile
    Bad /badly
    Balance Vs Remainder
    Because
    Because Of
    Between You And Me
    Bi-/semi-
    Both ... And
    Both Vs As Well As
    Brevity
    Bunch
    Cannot Help But
    Can Vs May
    Capitalization
    Capital Vs Capitol
    Clarity And Conciseness
    Colon
    Commas
    Committee
    Compare To/with
    Compose Vs Comprise
    Conjunctions
    Connotation
    Consensus
    Context
    Continual Vs Continuous
    Contribute
    Credible Vs Creditable
    Credit As/with
    Criterion / Criteria / Criterions
    Cumulative Vs Accumulative
    Dash
    Dates
    Datum Vs Data
    Decided Vs Decisive
    Defective Vs Deficient
    Definite Vs Definitive
    Denotation
    Despite
    Despite / Despite Of
    Distinguish From
    Do It/so
    Due To
    Each Other
    Each Other Vs One Another
    Economic Vs Economical
    Effect
    Either/or
    Elude Vs Allude Vs Refer
    Ensure Vs Insure
    Euphemisms
    Everybody Vs Everyone
    Farther Vs Further
    Few
    Figuratively Vs Literally
    Fine
    Flammable
    Foreign Words
    Good Vs Well
    Half
    Hyphens
    If And When
    If Vs. Whether
    Illegal Vs Illicit
    Illusion Vs Allusion
    Inasmuch-as
    In Comparison To/with
    In-contrast-towith
    Incredible Vs Incredulous
    Infinitive Verbs
    Inflammable
    Initialisms
    In Order To
    Inside (of)
    Insofar As
    Insoluble Vs Unsolvable
    In Spite Of
    Intensifiers
    In-terms-of
    Its Vs. It's
    Lay Vs. Lie
    Lend/loan
    Liable
    Libel
    -like
    Likely
    Lists
    Literally Vs Figuratively
    Long Variants
    Loose Vs Lose
    May Be Vs Maybe
    May Vs Can
    More/less Than
    Most Vs Almost
    Mr. Morton
    MS (MSS)
    Neither/nor
    Neo-
    Nice
    Nominalization
    Nonflammable
    Notable Vs Noticeable
    Not And
    Nouns
    Number Vs.amount
    Observance Vs Observation
    Of Which Vs Whose
    Okay / OK / O.K.
    On Account Of
    One Another
    Only
    On The Grounds Of/that
    Oral
    Outside (of)
    Parallel Structure
    Party
    Passed Vs Past
    Passive Voice
    People Vs Persons
    Per
    Plural Possessive Nouns
    Possessive Nouns
    Precision In Writing
    Predicate
    Pronoun Antecedent Agreement
    Pronouns
    Proved Vs Proven
    Quid Pro Quo
    Quite
    Rather
    Redundant Words
    Refer Vs Allude Vs Elude
    Remainder
    Respective/respectively
    Schoolhouse Rock
    Semi-/bi-
    Semicolon
    Shall Vs Will
    Singular Possessive Nouns
    -size / -sized
    So
    Some
    Some Vs Somewhat
    So That Vs Such That
    Split Infinitives
    Spoken English Vs Written English
    Strata Vs Stratum
    Subject
    Subject Verb Agreement
    Subject-verb Agreement
    Such
    Such That Vs So That
    Tenant Vs Tenet
    Tenet Vs Tenant
    Than Vs. Then
    That Vs Where
    The Fact Is
    Too
    To Vs Too Vs Two
    Try And/to
    Unsolvable Ve Insoluble
    Verbal
    Verbs
    Very
    Waiting For/on
    Well Vs Good
    When And If
    Where . . . At
    Where Vs That
    Whether Or Not
    While
    Whose Vs Of Which
    Who's Vs Whose
    Who Vs. Whom
    Will Vs Shall
    -wise
    Wordiness
    Words Used As Words

    RSS Feed

    Copyright © 2014-2015
    words by kurt
    LLC

We Would Love to Help You Become a Better Writer!


Tech Writing

Accepting new jobs now!

Nonfiction

Accepting new jobs now!

Family History

Accepting new jobs now!

Consulting

Accepting new jobs now!