words by kurt
  • Home
  • Core Clients
    • Engineers & Scientists
    • Nonfiction Authors
    • Family Historians
    • Consulting
  • Quotes & Pricing
  • Resources
  • Writing Tips
  • Contact
Improving writing one writer at a time

Tip #5: Optionally use semicolons to connect related sentences

1/30/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Many times in writing there is no one right answer but rather multiple appropriate options.  The writer may select from any of those options according to stylistic concerns for the document and, very often, just plain personal preference.  The semicolon provides a good example.

Semicolons most commonly join related sentences together.  The most common error I have seen in this regard is the use of another mark of punctuation when the semicolon is actually most appropriate.

Consider the excerpt in the cropped image above.  Here we see two instances, one right after the other, in which the semicolon is more appropriate than what the writer selected.

Instance #1: Use of semicolon over the comma

I feel like a broken record whenever I say this, but it bears repeating.  Writing and speaking are two different animals.  Commas do not indicate pauses in writing like they do in speaking.  Thus, the first instance (underlined in red in the cropped image) shows an inappropriate punctuation choice in which the writer has attempted to join two complete sentences with a comma.   Commas never join complete sentences. The writer has two options for correcting this error.

Option #1: Use a period to end each complete sentence.

This is the standard option, since shorter sentences tend to communicate more effectively to more people.  Using this option, the corrected version would read as follows:

. . . is an absolute masterpiece and a must-have.  It is the #1 materials property resource used during the exam.

I took the liberty of supplying the author’s missing hyphen.  If you don’t understand why the author needs a hyphen, see my tip on using the hyphen from last week.

Option #2: Use a semicolon to join two related sentences.

The semicolon connects two ideas while signaling that the second further explains the first.  Using a semicolon produces the following:

. . . is an absolute masterpiece and a must-have; it is the #1 materials property resource used during the exam.

Instance #2: Use of semicolon over nothing

The same two options exist with the next instance (underlined in blue in the cropped image).  Thus, the writer may choose between the following:

I don’t think any metallurgist can argue against that.  However, it is not a study guide.

I don’t think any metallurgist can argue against that; however, it is not a study guide.

Again I took liberties to correct the original, this time with capitalization.  I’ll provide a tip on capitalization next week.

In the example here, declaring that the ASM Metal Handbook is not a study guide further expands the idea that no one would likely disagree that the ASM Metal Handbook is a must-have masterpiece.  Thus, use of the semicolon is appropriate here.

Which option is better?  It depends on what the writer hopes to achieve.  The author appears to want an informal tone.  Use of the semicolon tends towards formality since it creates a longer sentence.  Shorter sentences lend themselves to informal tone.  Although readers here are mostly engineers who have education and experience sufficient to test for professional licensure, shorter sentences still tend to communicate more effectively than longer ones.

Thus, I recommend Option #1.  However, the use of the semicolon here is very much correct.  And an occasional use of the semicolon will not likely formalize the tone significantly.

Again, it all goes back to what the writer prefers; both options in this instance are appropriate.  (Hey, look what I just did!)  I have only one caveat.  Overuse of the semicolon will introduce more formality and reduce readability.  That portion of the audience which struggles to understand the meaning being conveyed will increase.  Like most things in life, semicolons are best used in moderation.  Writers should use it appropriately when they do use it on occasion.
0 Comments

Tip #4: Use hyphens to join words acting together

1/23/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Hyphens used to connect neighboring words can provide more effective modifiers.  Yet confusion continues with how to use the hyphen properly.

A hyphen between two words indicates that both words are needed to convey the clearest meaning.  Using a hyphen to connect two or more words essentially makes them one word.  Thus, the hyphen is used correctly when all of the words joined are needed to convey the clearest meaning.

Example of improper usage

Consider the example provided in the cropped image.  Using a hyphen to connect visionary and thinking suggests that visionary-thinking is some unique form of thinking.  It very well may be, but if that were what was really meant that distinction is so unconventional that it should be described more elsewhere.  Because it is not, the hyphen really is not needed.  (In addition, here we see a correct use of the word ensure, which we discussed last week.)

Example of proper usage

Correctly used, the hyphen joins together words that act together.  Consider a shade of color that combines both red and gray.  Here is an example of a correct use of the hyphen.


The red-gray shade caught his eye.

Excluding the hyphen would communicate that each modifier is acting independent of any others to modify the noun shade.  The shade in question has characteristics of both colors.  Because only both adjectives together provide the clearest description of the shade in question, a hyphen is needed to indicate that both adjectives are acting in concert together.  It's not just a red shade or a gray shade but a red-gray shade.

Rule of thumb

Performing a brief comparison has always helped me to use the hyphen correctly.  

To know whether a hyphen is needed, I simply ask myself whether each word alone suffices as a modifier.  If I can use the words by themselves to communicate my meaning, then I don’t need the hyphen.  If I can’t, then I do.

And hyphens can connect different parts of speech as well as just adjectives.  Consider a restaurant shaped like a pie and located at the top of a huge tower.  We might indicate the midnight closing time of said establishment with a sentence like this one:

The pie-in-the-sky restaurant is open until midnight.

We need each and every one of the four words pie, in, the, and sky to convey the most clear meaning.  It’s not just a pie restaurant.  It’s not a “in restaurant” or a “the restaurant”, and it certainly is not a sky restaurant (although it is located high above the ground).  No, the most clear meaning is conveyed with pie-in-the-sky.  Hence the use of the hyphen to indicate that all four words act in concert.

I hope you find this tip helpful.  If you have another device that helps you to use the hyphen correctly, please share it with everyone below.
0 Comments

Tip #3: Use ensure and insure properly

1/16/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Engineers are not alone in committing a common error: the use of ensure versus insure.  The confusion is understandable.  Both words have the same pronunciation, and the spelling is different by only one letter.  Plus the meanings of the two words are closely related.  But a world of difference exists between what the two words communicate.

Ensure means to make sure or certain that X will occur.  Insure means to provide assurance that Y will occur if X does.

Example of proper usage

The cropped image shows an example of correct word selection.  This example describes the duties of traffic engineers, reporting that “they ensure engineering principles are used”.  This usage is correct.

Example of improper usage

Using insure in that example would result in the following:


They insure engineering principles are used . . . .

which would mean that traffic engineers are providing an assurance that something will happen (which is not described) if some unknown event occurs to or involves (again, we don’t know) engineering principles.  That makes no sense.

However, the usage seen in the image makes very good sense.  It means that traffic engineers make sure or certain that engineering principles are used.

Rule of thumb

Here is a mnemonic device that I use to distinguish between the two words.

I need to ensure that I insure my car.

This device works for me when I remember that insurance is always spelled with an i, so insure must go with car.  Alternatively, I could also remember that e comes before i in the alphabet.  Either way, this sentence communicates the meanings of both ensure and insure in a compact, effective manner.  Feel free to use this device if you find it helpful.  Or if you have another method that works well for you, use that.  Also feel free to share that other method below so that everyone can benefit.
1 Comment

Tip #2: Avoid commas in lists of less than three items

1/9/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Many people mistakenly believe that writing is easy.  And with that mistaken belief they often write like they speak.  Yet that practice rarely if ever produces solid writing.  Here is a common example of how writing like speaking produces less effective writing.  Observe the example shown in the cropped image.  The use of the comma in the last sentence represents a common speech pattern: the pause.  In speech, an effectively used pause can emphasize specific ideas or impress a desired message upon a listener.

Speaking and writing, however, are two different animals.  

In writing, commas do not represent pauses as do they in speaking.  Commas signal sentence construction; they indicate relationships between phrases within a sentence or between items within a single phrase (such as in a list).  Depending on what those relationships are, the comma may not even be needed.

In the example shown in the image, the final phrases in the last sentence describe the methodology presented in the paper.  The description has two elements:

  1. “indicating and eradicating problem root causes”
  2. “the root causes of complex systems failures”

We know these are the elements because of the use of the conjunction and.  The adverb specifically identifies the second element as a subordinate element of the first; root causes of complex systems failures are a specific type of problem root causes.

Option #1: Remove the commas.

I can just hear someone in a conference somewhere reading this paper as the text of his or her presentation.  Placing a comma to separate out items in a two-item list makes no sense grammatically.  Commas are used to separate items in a list of three or more items.  The commas here are not even needed.  Thus, I would recommend removing them.  The sentence would then read as follows:

This paper presents a manner of indicating and eradicating problem root causes and specifically the root causes of complex system failures.

Option #2: Remove the commas and tighten the sentence.

If the paper provides no more than a brief mention of the general case of problem root causes, then the paper really isn’t about the general case at all, and the writer could provide a more effective sentence by tightening it.

This paper presents a manner of indicating and eradicating the root causes of complex systems failures.

Again, no need for the comma.

Option #3: Use the comma in a grammatically correct manner.

However, if the writer were particularly attached the comma in this example sentence, he or she could use the comma to separate out the adverb specifically.  The sentence would then read as follows:

This paper presents a manner of indicating and eradicating problem root causes and, specifically, the root causes of complex systems failures.

This option retains some hearkening of the pause pattern common to speaking while still being grammatically correct.  In this case, the commas are purely optional.

Personally, I would examine the content of the paper and pursue Option #2 if it is appropriate.  If it is not appropriate, and the writer insists that the focus areas in the content remain unchanged, then I recommend Option #1.  Speaking and writing are two different animals, and given options I usually recommend the cleaner, tighter manner of expression.  And the writer usually has options.
0 Comments

Tip #1: Check for agreement

1/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Many people mistakenly believe that writing is easy.  And with that mistaken belief they often write like they speak.  Yet that practice rarely if ever produces solid writing.

Check out the example in the cropped image.  Note that the sentence ends with "a great place for an engineer to make a name for themselves."  Themselves is plural, but its antecedent (the word the pronoun references) is engineer, which is singular.

This practice of using a plural pronoun to reference a singular antecedent is common in speech.  But it doesn't make for good writing.  Pronouns and their antecedents must agree in number.

Using the singular pronoun himself once solved the issue without presenting problems.  However, with changing views of gender within modern society, using himself can be viewed as sexist.  Some have simply replaced himself with herself, but this selection is just as awkward in the other direction.

The writer has two options to correct the error.

Option #1: Make both the pronoun and antecedent singular.


My recommendation with this option is to use himself or herself.  While some view this construction as clunky, it avoids the awkwardness felt by a female reader trying to relate to himself or a male reader trying to relate to herself.  That feeling of connected inclusion is important for keeping your audience engaged.  In addition to being inclusive, himself or herself agrees in number with its antecedent.  Thus, applying this recommendation would produce the corrected phrase:


. . . this city is a great place for an engineer to make a name for himself or herself.

Option #2: Make both the pronoun and antecedent plural.

With this option, the writer skips the gender issue entirely.  Themselves is already plural, so then making engineer plural brings the antecedent in numerical agreement with the pronoun.  Applying this option produces the corrected phrase:

. . . this city is a great place for engineers to make a name for themselves.

Personally, I prefer Option #2.  It is simpler and cleaner.  But that is just a stylistic choice I make when I am the writer.  When you are the writer, you can make your own choice.  Just make sure your pronouns and your antecedents agree in number.
0 Comments
    Picture

    Author

    Howdy!  I'm Lance, Managing Editor of words by kurt.  I'm also an engineer and an educator.  With degrees in both engineering and English, I've been providing writing-related services since 1997, and I want to help my fellow engineers become better writers.  That's why in 2014 I started providing free writing tips via this blog.  Enjoy!

    Archives

    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    Abbreviations
    Accumulative Vs Cumulative
    Acronyms
    Activate Vs Actuate
    Active Voice
    Active Voice Vs. Passive Voice
    Adapt Vs Adept Vs Adopt
    Ad Hoc
    Adjectives
    Adverbs
    Affect
    Affect Vs Effect
    Affinity
    Aforesaid
    Agree In Number
    All Around / All-around / All-round
    All Ready Vs Already
    All Together Vs Altogether
    Allude Vs Elude Vs Refer
    Allusion Vs Illusion
    Almost Vs Most
    A Lot
    Also
    Apostrophe
    As Per
    As Such
    Assure Vs Ensure Vs Insure
    As To
    As To Whether
    As Well As Vs Both
    Attribute
    Audience
    Average
    A While Vs Awhile
    Bad /badly
    Balance Vs Remainder
    Because
    Because Of
    Between You And Me
    Bi-/semi-
    Both ... And
    Both Vs As Well As
    Brevity
    Bunch
    Cannot Help But
    Can Vs May
    Capitalization
    Capital Vs Capitol
    Clarity And Conciseness
    Colon
    Commas
    Committee
    Compare To/with
    Compose Vs Comprise
    Conjunctions
    Connotation
    Consensus
    Context
    Continual Vs Continuous
    Contribute
    Credible Vs Creditable
    Credit As/with
    Criterion / Criteria / Criterions
    Cumulative Vs Accumulative
    Dash
    Dates
    Datum Vs Data
    Decided Vs Decisive
    Defective Vs Deficient
    Definite Vs Definitive
    Denotation
    Despite
    Despite / Despite Of
    Distinguish From
    Do It/so
    Due To
    Each Other
    Each Other Vs One Another
    Economic Vs Economical
    Effect
    Either/or
    Elude Vs Allude Vs Refer
    Ensure Vs Insure
    Euphemisms
    Everybody Vs Everyone
    Farther Vs Further
    Few
    Figuratively Vs Literally
    Fine
    Flammable
    Foreign Words
    Good Vs Well
    Half
    Hyphens
    If And When
    If Vs. Whether
    Illegal Vs Illicit
    Illusion Vs Allusion
    Inasmuch-as
    In Comparison To/with
    In-contrast-towith
    Incredible Vs Incredulous
    Infinitive Verbs
    Inflammable
    Initialisms
    In Order To
    Inside (of)
    Insofar As
    Insoluble Vs Unsolvable
    In Spite Of
    Intensifiers
    In-terms-of
    Its Vs. It's
    Lay Vs. Lie
    Lend/loan
    Liable
    Libel
    -like
    Likely
    Lists
    Literally Vs Figuratively
    Long Variants
    Loose Vs Lose
    May Be Vs Maybe
    May Vs Can
    More/less Than
    Most Vs Almost
    Mr. Morton
    MS (MSS)
    Neither/nor
    Neo-
    Nice
    Nominalization
    Nonflammable
    Notable Vs Noticeable
    Not And
    Nouns
    Number Vs.amount
    Observance Vs Observation
    Of Which Vs Whose
    Okay / OK / O.K.
    On Account Of
    One Another
    Only
    On The Grounds Of/that
    Oral
    Outside (of)
    Parallel Structure
    Party
    Passed Vs Past
    Passive Voice
    People Vs Persons
    Per
    Plural Possessive Nouns
    Possessive Nouns
    Precision In Writing
    Predicate
    Pronoun Antecedent Agreement
    Pronouns
    Proved Vs Proven
    Quid Pro Quo
    Quite
    Rather
    Redundant Words
    Refer Vs Allude Vs Elude
    Remainder
    Respective/respectively
    Schoolhouse Rock
    Semi-/bi-
    Semicolon
    Shall Vs Will
    Singular Possessive Nouns
    -size / -sized
    So
    Some
    Some Vs Somewhat
    So That Vs Such That
    Split Infinitives
    Spoken English Vs Written English
    Strata Vs Stratum
    Subject
    Subject Verb Agreement
    Subject-verb Agreement
    Such
    Such That Vs So That
    Tenant Vs Tenet
    Tenet Vs Tenant
    Than Vs. Then
    That Vs Where
    The Fact Is
    Too
    To Vs Too Vs Two
    Try And/to
    Unsolvable Ve Insoluble
    Verbal
    Verbs
    Very
    Waiting For/on
    Well Vs Good
    When And If
    Where . . . At
    Where Vs That
    Whether Or Not
    While
    Whose Vs Of Which
    Who's Vs Whose
    Who Vs. Whom
    Will Vs Shall
    -wise
    Wordiness
    Words Used As Words

    RSS Feed

    Copyright © 2014-2015
    words by kurt
    LLC

We Would Love to Help You Become a Better Writer!


Tech Writing

Accepting new jobs now!

Nonfiction

Accepting new jobs now!

Family History

Accepting new jobs now!

Consulting

Accepting new jobs now!